Survivors of F-227

?Note how, even in the midst of reluctantly committing acts they themselves anchor extremely repugnant-and ones they fully k modern the world condemns-this group developed norms to dictate their behavior. This was crucial for these survivors, because group support, along with its attendant norms, is critical in maintaining a sense of a ?good? self.?My initial reply to this article was pity. I really did feel bad for the passengers of the aircraft; to throw to go through something like that really is just terrible. I think that you should never try and b tire Mother nature because she will always prevail. You notify not brust the forces of the earth. I think it was foolish of the few players that did to call the pilots cowards, for there is no shame in trying to be safe, especially when you argon flying an aircraft over hazardous mountains.

At first I found it bizarre that pot used God as an excuse for eating there fellow passengers because I bankd they were warrant in eating them. In a life or death situation you shouldn?t run through to try and rationalize your reasoning for trying to survive, and I think that they didn?t indigence to bring God into it. I disagree with the raft that didn?t eat, moreover in a way understood there reasoning. It would be one of the hardest decisions one would support to make and having to eat another clement although it could save your life is utterly repelling and I wish to never have to experience it. I think that the reason God was brought up because it was there individualized way of trying to justify not eating human flesh.

?Some however, could not. Javier and Liliana Methol, husband and wife, though they longed to return to their children, could not eat human flesh. They said that the others could do as they liked, nevertheless mayhap God wanted them to choose to die.?I personally believe do not believe in God but if there was one wouldn?t he want his people to survive? I believe that when you die your soul is bypast from your body, where it goes I do not know. The body is naught but a shell of what it once was. If I were to die of rowing I would not want my body to be un beare for no purpose but if it was deviation to make the divergency between life or death for someone I would have no objection in them eating my body.

?Changed great deal make people more open to accepting new definitions of worldly concern.?I believe this to be true. For instance I don?t think they would?ve eaten each other if they had means of chase or graspting other kinds of food.



In most cases people don?t usually harm people unless compel to do so in a changed circumstance. If your life was imperil you would either accept a new definition of reality and defend yourself in a way that you might not usually chose, or not accept it and become wound or even killed. Its like the saying ?Drastic propagation call for drastic measures.? People usually don?t like change, and only change when needed. Without change you are sheath to a sense of security and when change comes around you get scared because change can be scary and it can be for the worse, but it can also be for the give away and in this situation having to eat your friends is a change for the bust and worse.

This world is cruel and harsh and at times you have to do things you don?t want to do, but if your going to make it in life you need to step up and do what is necessary to survive, even if it means eating a human or putting on skin socks. Its close to survival and in this world you have to do what you have to do to survive, and people shouldn?t judge you for what you do to throw on going.

If you want to get a full essay, ensnare it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper