Argument final paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Argument closing - Research Paper Exampleilable medical remedies, and so many patients suffering from these diseases are make to outlive s ever soe and chronic pain, vomiting, difficulty in breathing, and other similar discomforts. They are often also made to blockadeure such symptoms for days and even months before they eventually die. In the interim, they often reach the menstruation of wanting to end their suffering and pain by ending their life. Lacking the strength and the means to end it, these patients turn to their physicians to assist them in ending their life. But legalizing physician-assisted self-annihilation (PAS) is a dangerous step which is real more against the basic principles of the medical practice. With such a premise, this paper shall discuss and support the thesis that physician-assisted suicide should not be made legal.An important consideration in the assisted suicide discussion is the position that committing it is against the basic principle of non- maleficence or of not doing any harm to ones patient. The Hippocratic swearing which serves as the basic ethical mandate of the medical practice expressly prohibits physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia (Finlay, 2005). This cuss declares that a physician should not administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will the physician suggest such a course (as cited by Demy and Stewart, 1998, p. 249). In the time of Hippocrates, assisted suicide and euthanasia were very much against the principles of medicine. In the current context however, assisted suicide and euthanasia are ideas which are new and variant from the concepts of medicine and care (Walker, 2001). Those who support physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia also have different ideas on what it is to be a physician and what the moral boundaries of the practice are. It is also telling that the current public interest in PAS comes at a time when the palliative powers of American medicine are greater than they h ave ever been in the past (Walker, 2001, p. 27). All in all,